Three journals · one editorial standard

Better decisions.
Stronger scholarship.

Complete editorial guidance and ready-to-use forms—from manuscript screening to issue publication.

Built aroundCOPEDOAJPRISMACrossref
MANUSCRIPTAJ–0247
ABSTRACT
Clear contribution
Check methods
REVIEWED
EDITORIAL DESK
EDITORIAL STATUSReady for decision

Journal resource desks

Guidance with the right context.

Each journal applies shared standards with discipline-specific screening and review priorities.

African Journal of Commercial Studies coverNavy blue identity
AJOCS

African Journal of Commercial Studies

Commercial studies, business, management, economics and applied scholarship.

African Multidisciplinary Scholarship Journal coverLight green identity
AMSJ

African Multidisciplinary Scholarship Journal

Multidisciplinary African scholarship across social sciences and applied research.

AJOCS RESOURCE DESK

African Journal of Commercial Studies

Screening focus

Confirm a clear commercial or managerial contribution, relevant business context and actionable implications supported by evidence.

Review & reporting

Check transparent quantitative, qualitative or mixed-method reporting and consistency between business claims, results and conclusions.

EAFJ RESOURCE DESK

East African Finance Journal

Screening focus

Confirm relevance to finance and the East African or comparable context, a defensible contribution and clear policy or practice value.

Review & reporting

Scrutinise variable definitions, data provenance, model assumptions, robustness tests and causal or forecasting claims.

AMSJ RESOURCE DESK

African Multidisciplinary Scholarship Journal

Screening focus

Confirm genuine multidisciplinary value, relevance to African scholarship and a contribution understandable beyond one specialist field.

Review & reporting

Apply the reporting standard appropriate to each method while checking cross-disciplinary terminology, integration and accessibility.

Complete guidance library

What do you need to do?

Open any guide for practical steps, decision points and working forms.

Editor

Initial manuscript screening

A consistent check for scope, originality, structure, ethics and submission completeness.

8-point checklist · 4 min read
Reviewer

Constructive peer review

Evaluate rigour, contribution and clarity—and turn observations into actionable comments.

Review framework · 7 min read
Ethics

Publication ethics desk guide

Practical responses to plagiarism, duplicate submission, authorship disputes and data concerns.

Decision guide · 6 min read
Editor

Writing editorial decisions

Clear, fair language for accept, minor revision, major revision and rejection decisions.

4 templates · 5 min read
Author

Preparing a revision

Respond point-by-point, track changes and resubmit a clean, complete package.

Author guide · 3 min read
Workflow

Issue production checklist

Move accepted papers through copyediting, layout, metadata, DOI registration and publication.

12 steps · 8 min read

Download centre

Ready-to-use Word
and PDF templates.

Edit Word for live work or use PDF as a stable printable form.

From submission to publication

A rigorous workflow,
without the guesswork.

Mark each stage as the manuscript progresses.

0 of 5 stages complete

Editorial essentials

Standards you can
put into practice.

01

Fair & independent review

Choose reviewers for expertise, manage conflicts and assess scholarly merit.

02

Research integrity

Use proportionate, documented procedures for ethical concerns.

03

Complete metadata

Accurate names, ORCIDs and references make work discoverable.